|
Post by prowler7 on Nov 9, 2008 1:27:54 GMT -5
I know I didn't say it before, but I'm very happy with the fact that 1st edition got a good work over. Thank you guys, you've done a great job. You are very welcome, thank you for the kind words. We are striving to close as many holes as we can in the rules, while at the same time making the game easier to play ruleswise (ie not so many rules). We are quite proud of the fact we boiled down over 40 pages of combined rules, errata, faq into around 20.
|
|
|
Post by dbaker on Nov 24, 2008 13:54:42 GMT -5
"Arms and Tactics (1ed version) Remove 5- You may remove 5 cards from your hand/endurance/discard and place them under this card. If you do, remove this card from the game. The cards under this card stay under this card, and are not considered removed from the game."
Is this the way the Remove 5 is going to work in both Type 1 and Type 2?
|
|
|
Post by headswillroll on Nov 24, 2008 15:43:44 GMT -5
"Arms and Tactics (1ed version) Remove 5- You may remove 5 cards from your hand/endurance/discard and place them under this card. If you do, remove this card from the game. The cards under this card stay under this card, and are not considered removed from the game." Is this the way the Remove 5 is going to work in both Type 1 and Type 2? Nope, sorry about that one. It is a clerical error. The "2ed" was supposed to be removed from that entry. This errata only applies to the 1ed version of Arms and Tactics (remove 5). This is an Official Ruling.
|
|
dcapotate
Elder Immortal
Call Me Horseman Zero
Posts: 346
|
Post by dcapotate on Dec 23, 2008 17:45:22 GMT -5
If I understand correctly what you're saying about A&T (remove five), if A&T is removed from the game and the 5 cards stay under it when it is removed, then ipso facto they are also removed from the game BUT are not considered removed from the game for purposes such as a new card that might return cards to your discard pile that have been removed from the game. Am I anywhere close to what happens?
|
|
dcapotate
Elder Immortal
Call Me Horseman Zero
Posts: 346
|
Post by dcapotate on Dec 23, 2008 17:55:52 GMT -5
I'd also like to report a new headache for you due to early printing errors in SFV. I own a copy of a Gladius WOC with the incorrect text back of the Kanzashi and a Malick persona with the incorrect text back of Colin MacLeod. I assume this rule about errors being playable only with the correct back being added by another card will fix most cards but if - for example - Gladius is reprinted with any new text, then I will get to choose which text to add by which card back I play. Again, not much change since I could use either anyway, yet who knows what could be important in the future with cards yet undesigned will be coming?
|
|
|
Post by prowler7 on Dec 23, 2008 19:00:02 GMT -5
If I understand correctly what you're saying about A&T (remove five), if A&T is removed from the game and the 5 cards stay under it when it is removed, then ipso facto they are also removed from the game BUT are not considered removed from the game for purposes such as a new card that might return cards to your discard pile that have been removed from the game. Am I anywhere close to what happens? They are not considered Removed From The Game for ANY purposes. These cards cannot be brought back into play by any means, and they are NOT considered to be removed from the game.
|
|
|
Post by prowler7 on Dec 23, 2008 19:04:25 GMT -5
for example - Gladius is reprinted with any new text, then I will get to choose which text to add by which card back I play. This is a rule that has never been in print, but has been inferred since 2ed began. All 2ed card text is superceded by later printings of the same set. This rule allows card text to be fixed and affect all the previous misprintings of that SAME card. **SPOILER** The above rule IS in the Type Two Rulebook, so it will finally be in print when that is released.
|
|
dcapotate
Elder Immortal
Call Me Horseman Zero
Posts: 346
|
Post by dcapotate on Dec 26, 2008 17:36:18 GMT -5
An inferred rule is no rule at all. It is good that type 2 rulebook fixes that.
|
|
|
Post by headswillroll on Dec 26, 2008 21:43:18 GMT -5
An inferred rule is no rule at all. It is good that type 2 rulebook fixes that. Jerry, come back!!! Come back Jerry!!! The nice men in the white outfits will give you ice cream if you are good.
|
|
|
Post by Thorr on Dec 31, 2008 9:15:24 GMT -5
Link updated for new 2009 version
|
|
|
Post by headswillroll on Jan 1, 2009 17:54:28 GMT -5
Thanks Thorr.
|
|