|
Post by jamesmcmurray on May 28, 2007 14:59:05 GMT -5
Yeah. I imagine he could actually be pretty beefy, especially since he's part of the MLE universe and has access to things like the Dark Duncan Q.
|
|
|
Post by Thorr on May 28, 2007 19:33:27 GMT -5
We often have Vazilek tourneys that get really fun.
Yes his power is a limited Richie power.
|
|
|
Post by headswillroll on May 30, 2007 8:30:22 GMT -5
Interesting ability, the neutrered richie with a secondary effect that could be refreshing (note: word of the day) in deck construction. I can see a lot of possiblities. Headswillroll
|
|
|
Post by Brent Bailey on May 30, 2007 15:15:38 GMT -5
If Yung Dol Kim plays an Attack as a Block, then it is considered a Block. Same for making an Exertion for it. As players, do you think it is necessary to spell out on his Persona or not?
Thanks,
Brent
|
|
|
Post by jamesmcmurray on May 30, 2007 15:19:41 GMT -5
I don't think so. Unfortunately a lot of gamers are exceedingly literal-minded and for those types it's very useful to have it on the card.
|
|
|
Post by prowler7 on May 30, 2007 16:53:09 GMT -5
I don't think so. Unfortunately a lot of gamers are exceedingly literal-minded and for those types it's very useful to have it on the card. Or at least in an FAQ of the rules. Like it or not, there are rules lawyers, and if you dont have lawyers looking for loopholes so they can be CLOSED, then you will run into those rules at a tourney and have it ruled incorrectly. Better to have it spelled out SOMEWHERE so there can be no confusion.
|
|
ummyeah
Ancient Immortal
Posts: 357
|
Post by ummyeah on May 31, 2007 10:22:39 GMT -5
Since the issue may come up without YDK being involved, ie. Block and Strike or a future 2e card, I would vote for an explanation being in the faq. That could cover everything in play now and anything you might come up with in the future. Plus it's much easier to change an faq than a bunch of cards.
|
|