|
Thief
Mar 12, 2008 17:09:36 GMT -5
Post by dbaker on Mar 12, 2008 17:09:36 GMT -5
An interesting thing happened at our last Type 1 tournament. I was playing Connor Macleod. I had out Leo Adkins and his Hilt. My opponent plays Thief-Event: remove all objects from play. Lose 1 ability for each object removed. What should happen? Leo Adkins states that if your opponent plays a card to remove one of your situations, plots or objects from play remove Leo Adkins instead. Dose Thief remove Leo Adkins only? Leo Adkins and the Hilt? Dose he take any damage? Many questions
|
|
|
Thief
Mar 12, 2008 17:31:18 GMT -5
Post by scottr on Mar 12, 2008 17:31:18 GMT -5
If there was only one object (the hilt), I would think Leo is removed in its place, and no ability loss occurs (because no object was removed).
(If there had been multiple objects, I would think that Thief would get all but one of them, and Leo would have replaced that one. Thief would do (# of objects - 1) ability loss)
What answer did you end up on at the tournament?
|
|
|
Thief
Mar 12, 2008 17:37:37 GMT -5
Post by dbaker on Mar 12, 2008 17:37:37 GMT -5
The first answer you gave is what we decided on.
|
|
|
Thief
Mar 12, 2008 19:09:32 GMT -5
Post by scottr on Mar 12, 2008 19:09:32 GMT -5
In my defense, they are the same answer - the second part just expands on the thought/guess for a related scenario :-)
|
|
|
Thief
Mar 28, 2008 9:33:13 GMT -5
Post by greg on Mar 28, 2008 9:33:13 GMT -5
Correct, Leo would replace one object, the rest would be removed.
|
|